Electronic Mail Policy

University of California
Office of the President
Reissued March 23, 1998


As per the attached letter from President Richard Atkinson, the University of California Electronic Mail Policy was reissued March 23, 1998. On that date, it became effective and superseded the policy issued on August 6, 1996. This policy has now been superseded by the Electronic Communications Policy issued November 17, 2000. The campus Implementing Guidelines will remain in effect until Electronic Communications Policy Implementing Guidelines are issued.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION
Cautions
II. PURPOSE
III. DEFINITIONS
IV. SCOPE
V. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Purpose
B. University Property
C. Service Restrictions
D. Consent and Compliance
E. Restrictions on Access Without Consent
F. Recourse
G. Misuse
VI. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
A. Allowable Use
1. Purpose
2. Users
3. Non-Competition
4. Restrictions
5. Representation
6. False Identity
7. Interference
8. Personal Use
B .Security and Confidentiality
C. Archiving and Retention
VII. POLICY VIOLATIONS
VIII. RESPONSIBILITY FOR POLICY
IX. CAMPUS RESPONSIBILITIES & DISCRETION
APPENDIX A, DEFINITIONS
APPENDIX B, REFERENCES
APPENDIX C, POLICIES RELATING TO NON-CONSENSUAL ACCESS

I. INTRODUCTION

This Policy clarifies the applicability of law and of other University policies to electronic mail. It also defines new policy and procedures where existing policies do not specifically address issues particular to the use of electronic mail.

The University recognizes that principles of academic freedom and shared governance, freedom of speech, and privacy of information hold important implications for electronic mail and electronic mail services. The University affords electronic mail privacy protections comparable to that which it traditionally affords paper mail and telephone communications. This Policy reflects these firmly-held principles within the context of the University’s legal and other obligations.

The University encourages the use of electronic mail and respects the privacy of users. It does not routinely inspect, monitor, or disclose electronic mail without the holder’s (as defined in Appendix A, Definitions) consent. Nonetheless, subject to the requirements for authorization, notification, and other conditions specified in this Policy, the University may deny access to its electronic mail services and may inspect, monitor, or disclose electronic mail (i) when required by and consistent with law; (ii) when there is substantiated reason (as defined in Appendix A, Definitions) to believe that violations of law or of University policies listed in Appendix C have taken place; (iii) when there are compelling circumstances as defined in Appendix A; or (iv) under time-dependent, critical operational circumstances as defined in Appendix A, Definitions.

Cautions:

Users should be aware of the following:

  1. Both the nature of electronic mail and the public character of the University's business (see Caution 2 below) make electronic mail less private than users may anticipate. For example, electronic mail intended for one person sometimes may be widely distributed because of the ease with which recipients can forward it to others. A reply to an electronic mail message posted on an electronic bulletin board or "listserver" intended only for the originator of the message may be distributed to all subscribers to the listserver. Furthermore, even after a user deletes an electronic mail record from a computer or electronic mail account it may persist on backup facilities, and thus be subject to disclosure under the provisions of Section V of this Policy. The University cannot routinely protect users against such eventualities.

  2. Electronic mail, whether or not created or stored on University equipment, may constitute a University record (see Appendix A, Definitions) subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act or other laws, or as a result of litigation. However, the University does not automatically comply with all requests for disclosure, but evaluates all such requests against the precise provisions of the Act, other laws concerning disclosure and privacy, or other applicable law.

    Users of University electronic mail services also should be aware that the California Public Records Act and other similar laws jeopardize the ability of the University to guarantee complete protection of personal electronic mail resident (see Section VI. A. 8) on University facilities.

    The California Public Records Act does not, in general, apply to students except in their capacity, if any, as employees or agents of the University. This exemption does not, however, exclude student email from other aspects of this Policy.

  3. The University, in general, cannot and does not wish to be the arbiter of the contents of electronic mail. Neither can the University, in general, protect users from receiving electronic mail they may find offensive. Members of the University community, however, are strongly encouraged to use the same personal and professional courtesies and considerations in electronic mail as they would in other forms of communication.

  4. There is no guarantee, unless "authenticated" mail systems are in use, that electronic mail received was in fact sent by the purported sender, since it is relatively straightforward, although a violation of this Policy, for senders to disguise their identity. Furthermore, electronic mail that is forwarded may also be modified. Authentication technology is not widely and systematically in use at the University as of the date of this Policy. As with print documents, in case of doubt receivers of electronic mail messages should check with the purported sender to validate authorship or authenticity.

  5. Encryption of electronic mail is another emerging technology that is not in widespread use as of the date of this Policy. This technology enables the encoding of electronic mail so that for all practical purposes it cannot be read by anyone who does not possess the right key. The answers to questions raised by the growing use of these technologies are not now sufficiently understood to warrant the formulation of University policy at this time. Users and operators of electronic mail facilities should be aware, however, that these technologies will become generally available and probably will be increasingly used by members of the community.

II. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Policy is to assure that:

  1. The University community is informed about the applicability of policies and laws to electronic mail;
  2. Electronic mail services are used in compliance with those policies and laws;
  3. Users of electronic mail services are informed about how concepts of privacy and security apply to electronic mail; and
  4. Disruptions to University electronic mail and other services and activities are minimized.

III. DEFINITIONS

The terms "electronic mail" and "email" are used interchangeably throughout this Policy.

The following terms used in this Policy are defined in Appendix A. Knowledge of these definitions is important to an understanding of this Policy.

IV. SCOPE

This Policy applies to:

Excluded from the foregoing are electronic mail services of Department of Energy Laboratories managed by the University, and email users of such electronic mail services who are employees and agents of those Laboratories.

This Policy applies only to electronic mail in its electronic form. The Policy does not apply to printed copies of electronic mail. Other University records management policies (see RMP series policies listed in Appendix B, References), however, do not distinguish among the media in which records are generated or stored. Electronic mail messages, therefore, in either their electronic or printed forms, are subject to those other policies, including provisions of those policies regarding retention and disclosure.

This Policy applies equally to transactional information (such as email headers, summaries, addresses, and addressees) associated with email records as it does to the contents of those records.

This Policy is effective immediately, with implementation guidelines to be effective July 1, 1998 (See Section IX).

V. GENERAL PROVISIONS

As noted in the Introduction, the University recognizes that principles of academic freedom, freedom of speech, and privacy of information hold important implications for electronic mail and electronic mail services. This Policy reflects these firmly-held principles within the context of the University’s legal and other obligations.

VI. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS

VII. POLICY VIOLATIONS

Violations of University policies governing the use of University electronic mail services may result in restriction of access to University information technology resources. In addition, disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, may be applicable under other University policies, guidelines, implementing procedures, or collective bargaining agreements.

VIII. RESPONSIBILITY FOR POLICY

The Associate Vice President, Information Resources and Communications (IR&C) in the Office of the President is responsible for development and maintenance of this Policy for issuance by the President.

IX. CAMPUS RESPONSIBILITIES AND DISCRETION

Each Chancellor shall develop, maintain, and publish specific procedures and practices that implement this Policy and communicate its provisions to campus users of University electronic mail services. The following are assigned to individual campus authority and discretion:


APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS

Computing Facility(ies): Computing resources, services, and network systems such as computers and computer time, data processing or storage functions, computer systems and services, servers, networks, input/output and connecting devices, and related computer records, programs, software, and documentation.

Electronic Mail Systems or Services: Any messaging system that depends on computing facilities to create, send, forward, reply to, transmit, store, hold, copy, download, display, view, read, or print computer records for purposes of asynchronous communication across computer network systems between or among individuals or groups, that is either explicitly denoted as a system for electronic mail or is implicitly used for such purposes, including services such as electronic bulletin boards, listservers, and newsgroups.

University Email Systems or Services: Electronic mail systems or services owned or operated by the University or any of its sub-units.

Email Record or Email: Any or several electronic computer records or messages created, sent, forwarded, replied to, transmitted, stored, held, copied, downloaded, displayed, viewed, read, or printed by one or several email systems or services. This definition of email records applies equally to the contents of such records and to transactional information associated with such records, such as headers, summaries, addresses, and addressees. This Policy applies only to electronic mail in its electronic form. The Policy does not apply to printed copies of electronic mail.

University Record: A "public record" as defined in Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8, Legal Requirements on Privacy of and Access to Information and the California Public Records Act. "Public records" include any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public's business prepared, owned, used, or retained (by the University) regardless of physical form or characteristics. [California Government Code Section 6252(d)]. With certain defined exceptions, such University records are subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.

University Email Record: A University Record in the form of an email record regardless of whether any of the computing facilities utilized to create, send, forward, reply to, transmit, store, hold, copy, download, display, view, read, or print the email record are owned by the University. This implies that the location of the record, or the location of its creation or use, does not change its nature as: (i) a University email record for purposes of this or other University policy (see, however, Sections V. D and E), and (ii) having potential for disclosure under the California Public Records Act.

Use of University or Other Email Services: To create, send, forward, reply to, transmit, store, hold, copy, download, display, view, read, or print email (with the aid of University email services). A (University) Email User is an individual who makes use of (University) email services.

Possession of Email: An individual is in "possession" of an email record, whether the original record or a copy or modification of the original record, when that individual has effective control over the location of its storage. Thus, an email record that resides on a computer server awaiting download to an addressee is deemed, for purposes of this Policy, to be in the possession of that addressee. Systems administrators and other operators of University email services are excluded from this definition of possession with regard to email not specifically created by or addressed to them.

Holder of an Email Record or Email Holder: An email user who is in possession of a particular email record, regardless of whether that email user is the original creator or a recipient of the content of the record.

Faculty: A member of the faculty as defined by Academic Personnel Policy 110-4 (14).

Substantiated Reason: Reliable evidence indicating that violation of law or of policies listed in Appendix C probably has occurred, as distinguished from rumor, gossip, or other unreliable evidence.

Compelling Circumstances: Circumstances where failure to act may result in significant bodily harm, significant property loss or damage, loss of significant evidence of one or more violations of law or of University policies listed in Appendix C, or significant liability to the University or to members of the University community.

Emergency Circumstances: Circumstances where time is of the essence and where there is a high probability that delaying action would almost certainly result in compelling circumstances.

Time-dependent and Critical Operational Circumstances: Circumstances where failure to act could seriously hamper the ability of the University to function administratively or to meet its teaching obligations, but excluding circumstances pertaining to personal or professional activities, or to faculty research or matters of shared governance.


APPENDIX B - REFERENCES

The following list identifies significant sources used as background in the preparation of this Policy, whether or not they are directly referenced by this Policy. It does not, however, include all federal and state laws and University policies that may apply to electronic mail. These policies and laws change from time to time; therefore users of this Policy are encouraged to refer to on-line versions of this and other University policies accessible on the Office of the President home page on the World Wide Web.


APPENDIX C - POLICIES RELATING TO NON-CONSENSUAL ACCESS

This University Electronic Mail Policy references circumstances where access to electronic mail may occur without the prior consent of the holder (see I. Introduction and Section V.E). Following is the list of University policies that may trigger such non-consensual access following procedures defined in Section V.E.2.

  1. Policies governing sexual or other forms of harassment, specifically: Section APM-035, Appendix A of the Faculty Code of Conduct; Personnel Policies for UC Staff Members; Administrative and Professional Staff Program Personnel Policies, Sections 112.1 and 112.2; Staff Personnel Policies, Section 200.2. (For exclusively represented employees in units where initial collective bargaining agreements are under negotiation, applicable personnel policies continue to govern until an agreement is concluded.) Sexual harassment by students is covered by item 6 below.

  2. Certain portions of policies governing access to University records, specifically RMP-1, Section III; RMP-8, Section VIIG; and RMP-8, Exhibit D.

  3. The Academic Personnel Manual, APM-015, Section II, Part II, limited to those parts headed Unacceptable Faculty Conduct, and the University Policy on Integrity in Research.

  4. University of California Personnel Policies for Staff Members, Administrative and Professional Staff Program Personnel Policies and Staff Personnel Policies. (For exclusively represented employees in units where initial collective bargaining agreements are under negotiation, applicable personnel policies continue to govern until an agreement is concluded.)

  5. All collective bargaining agreements and memoranda of understanding.

  6. Section 102, governing student conduct, of the policy entitled "Policies Applying to Campus Activities, Organizations, and Students".

  7. Sections V and VI of this Electronic Mail Policy.

Violations of other policies can normally be detected and investigated without requiring non-consensual access to electronic mail. However, on occasion attention to possible policy violations is brought about because of the receipt by others of electronic mail. Electronic mail, however can be forged; the true identity of the sender can be masked; and the apparent sender may deny authorship of the electronic mail. In such circumstances and provided there is substantiated reason (as defined in Appendix A, Definitions) that points to the identity of the sender, non-consensual access to the purported sender’s electronic mail may be authorized following the procedures defined in Section V.2, but only to the least extent necessary for verifying unambiguously the identity of the sender, and only for major violations of the following policies:

Posting and Authority to Change

Because University policies are subject to change, this list may change from time to time. The authoritative list at any time will be posted under the listings of University policies posted on the World Wide Web. Authority to change this list rests with the President of the University acting, where policies affecting faculty are concerned, with the advice of the Academic Senate.