#
BFB home
#

July 1, 1987


GUIDELINES FOR ACCESS TO UNIVERSITY PERSONNEL RECORDS 
                       BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES

I.  Introduction.

    All University records about individuals are classified as (1) 
    "confidential academic review records" (peer review records), (2) 
    "confidential records," (3) "personal records," or (4) "non-personal 
    records." Access rights by individuals and entities vary according to 
    the type of record.  Comprehensive requirements for access to all types 
    of University records are contained in Business and Finance Bulletin 
    RMP-8, "Legal Requirements on Privacy of and Access to Information." The 
    purpose of these guidelines is to supplement that document by specifying 
    the rights of Federal, state, and local government officials to access 
    the four categories of University personnel records.  Included in these 
    guidelines are the provisions of the two legal agreements between the 
    University and the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), and the State of 
    California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) pertaining 
    to access to confidential academic review (peer review records) during 
    investigations of discrimination complaints or compliance reviews.

    For additional information on access to and the privacy of personnel 
    information refer to:

       Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8, "Legal Requirements on Privacy of 
         and Access to Information," dated December 10, 1985;

       Academic Personnel Manual Section 160, "Maintenance of, Access to, and 
         Opportunity to Request Amendment of Academic Personnel Records," 
         revised July 5, 1984;* and

       Staff Personnel Policy 605, "Staff Personnel Records," dated September 
         1, 1981.**

     *All references to this policy apply to academic personnel except as 
      otherwise provided by a Memorandum of Understanding

     **Staff Personnel Policy 605 does not apply to staff employees covered 
       by a Memorandum of Understanding

II.  Access by Governmental Agencies to Confidential Academic Review 
     (Peer Review) Records.

     This section does not apply to access to peer review records by the U.S.  
     Department of Labor (DOL) or the State of California Department of Fair 
     Employment and Housing (DFEH) relating to complaints of discrimination 
     or compliance reviews.  See Sections III and IV.

     If a representative of a governmental agency other than DOL or DFEH 
     requests access to material in University personnel records which 
     includes items that are "confidential academic review records" (peer 
     review records) pursuant to Academic Personnel Manual Section 
     160-20-b(1) (Appendix A), such request must be in written form.  In 
     response to the written request, the requester should be informed that:

        The University of California is in full support of (name of agency)'s 
        need and duty to acquire information pertinent to carrying out its 
        functions.  University policies concerning confidential academic peer 
        review records, however, specify that such records are confidential 
        documents.  This designation of confidentiality is essential to the 
        University's academic personnel process to secure candid evaluations 
        of individuals under review.  The University provides safeguards in 
        the review process to assure that the confidentiality does not cloak 
        unfairness to individuals or result in abuse.

        With respect to academic peer review personnel records, our policies 
        take into account the need to protect individual rights of privacy.  
        Furthermore, our academic personnel policies provide that subject 
        individuals may receive, on request, a comprehensive summary of the 
        substance of the confidential documents in their files, edited to 
        withhold disclosure of the identity of persons who have supplied 
        evaluations of the subject individuals with the understanding that the 
        identity of the evaluator will be held in confidence.

        In light of the above policies, and provided that your agency has a 
        statutory right to review these records and shall maintain their 
        confidentiality, the University is prepared to make available for your 
        authorized representative on-site review of academic personnel files 
        relevant to your review.

    In applying the general policies regarding use of confidential academic 
    documents in the personnel process, and in order to balance the need to 
    protect the confidentiality of certain records against the legitimate 
    needs of access by governmental agencies, you should abide by the 
    following guidelines dealing with representatives of governmental 
    agencies who have requested material from peer review records:

    1.  You should allow the governmental agent to view on-site the complete 
        files which are relevant to the governmental review, but only after 
        the names of evaluators and any identifying particulars have been 
        removed.

    2.  If the governmental agent asks to remove copies of or make and remove 
        notes about peer review documents from the physical custody of your 
        campus or Laboratory, the following officers should be consulted prior 
        to response:

        a.  the Senior Vice President-Academic Affairs, and

        b.  General Counsel.

III.  Access by the U.S. Department of Labor to Confidential Academic 
      Review (Peer Review) Records Relating to Complaints of Discrimination or 
      to Compliance Reviews as Required by Consent Decree.*

      If a representative of the Department of Labor, Office of Federal 
      Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), requests access to material in 
      University records which includes items the University characterizes as 
      confidential pursuant to Academic Personnel Manual Section 160-20-b(1) 
      (academic peer review records), the following procedures, as set forth 
      in the Consent Decree, should be followed:

      "1.  The University shall provide OFCCP access for inspection and 
           copying of such books, records, accounts, and other materials 
           which OFCCP determines to be relevant and necessary whenever it 
           is reviewing the University's compliance with Executive Order 
           11246, as amended, and the rules, regulations and orders issued 
           pursuant thereto (hereinafter Executive Order 11246 or the 
           Executive Order).  The University shall allow OFCCP to remove 
           copies of said books, records, accounts, other materials, and 
           notes there from off campus or from any other place at 
           which they are maintained.**

      "2.  OFCCP will remove copies of books, records, accounts, and other 
           University materials off campus where it concludes that said 
           materials are necessary to its Executive Order review.  However, 
           where such books, records, accounts, or other materials concern 
           the following, and are and have been maintained in confidence by 
           the University, prior to making copies, the OFCCP investigator 
           (EOS) will justify his/her decision to the appropriate OFCCP Area 
           Office Director:

           "a.  Letters of evaluation or other statements pertaining to any 
                individual received by the University in the academic peer 
                review process with the understanding that the letter or 
                statement will be held in confidence;

           "b.  Letters from the chairperson (or equivalent officer) in the 
                academic peer review process setting forth a departmental 
                recommendation; and,

*An agreement between the University of California and the U.S.  
 Department of Labor dated October 3, 1980 pertaining to the latter's 
 access to University academic peer review records.  The full text of the 
 Consent Decree is available from the Office of the General Counsel.

**However, nothing in this Consent Decree shall be deemed to in any way 
  limit the University's right under 41 CFR 60-60.4(c) (or its successor) 
  to question the relevance of documents removed off campus or from any 
  other place in which they are maintained, and to seek their return 
  thereunder.

           "c.  Reports, recommendations, and other related documents from 
                administrative officers and campus ad hoc and standing 
                committee in the academic peer review process concerning 
                evaluations of individuals.

                Only if the Area Office Director concurs, will copies of any 
                of the above-listed documents be taken off campus or removed 
                from any other place where they are retained by the 
                University.  If the Area Office Director concurs, the 
                University shall be notified by the Area Office Director of 
                the documents to be copied and removed.  Copies will then be 
                taken off campus, or from other locations where they are 
                maintained by the University, in accordance with OFCCP's 
                Executive Order compliance assessment needs ...

      "4.  Where OFCCP takes copies of any of the documents listed in 
           paragraph 2, a-c, above, off campus or from other locations where 
           they are maintained by the University, all copies of such 
           documents (which have not been entered as hearing or trial 
           exhibits) shall be returned to the University within a reasonable 
           period of time after completion, as determined by the Department 
           of Labor, of a compliance review, complaint investigation, other 
           investigation, or administrative or judicial enforcement 
           proceedings.* The University will then maintain said copies 
           for at least ten (10) years unless the parties mutually agree on a 
           shorter period of retention, and will provide them to OFCCP whenever it 
           requests them.  When such documents are provided, OFCCP shall 
           maintain and return them in accordance with this Consent Decree."

* The term "completion" includes, but is not limited to, Departmental 
  reviews of such reviews, investigations, or proceedings.

IV.  Access by the State of California Department of Fair Employment and 
     Housing to Confidential Academic Review (Peer Review) Records Relating 
     to Complaints of Discrimination as Required by Disclosure Agreement.

     If a representative of DFEH requests access to material in University 
     academic peer review personnel records which includes items the 
     University characterizes as confidential pursuant to Academic Personnel 
     Manual Section 160-20-b(1), the procedures set forth in the Disclosure 
     Agreement (Appendix B) should be followed.  This agreement concerns 
     disclosure of University records when DFEH is investigating charges of 
     employment discrimination, and details the specific steps to be followed 
     when releasing all types of academic personnel records, including 
     comprehensive summaries of confidential academic review records and 
     actual review records.

V.  Access by Governmental Agencies to Academic, Staff, and Other 
    Employee Personnel Records Designated as Confidential (other than 
    Confidential Academic or Peer Review Records).

    Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8, "Legal Requirements on Privacy of 
    and Access to Information," Section VII.B.1.  provides a complete 
    definition of confidential information which includes, but is not 
    limited by law to, medical, psychological, and investigative information 
    about an individual.  See Appendix C.  Academic Personnel Manual Section 
    160-20-b(2) similarly defines confidential information and clarifies 
    that such academic personnel information is generally not part of the 
    peer review file, but is occasionally maintained by the University.  
    Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8 provides the definition of 
    confidential information for all staff employees.

    If a representative of a governmental agency requests access to 
    confidential academic, staff, or other employee personnel information, 
    such request must be in written form and the information should be made 
    available only if the governmental agency has a legal right to such 
    access.  Because of the sensitivity of confidential information and the 
    University's policy of protecting individual rights of privacy, the 
    requester should be informed that:

       The University of California is in full support of (name of agency)'s 
       need and duty to acquire information pertinent to carrying out its 
       functions.  Our personnel policies specify, however, that certain 
       materials in personnel records are confidential documents, and take 
       into account the rights of access of third parties, as well as the 
       need to protect individual rights of privacy.

       In light of these policies and in conformance with the law, the 
       University is prepared to make available for your authorized 
       representative on-site review of confidential personnel files relevant 
       to your review, provided that your agency has a statutory right to 
       review these records and shall maintain their confidentiality.

VI.  Access by Governmental Agencies to Academic, Staff, and Other 
     Employee Personnel Records Designated as Non-personal or Personal.

     The preceding guidelines have dealt with access to confidential academic 
     review (peer review) records, and the separately defined confidential 
     information about academic, staff, and other employees.  Following are 
     guidelines for governmental access to that personnel information which 
     the University considers non-personal or personal in nature.

     Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8, Section VII.B.3, Academic Personnel 
     Manual Section 160-20-b(3) and Staff Personnel Policy 605.18 specify 
     those types of personnel information which the University considers to 
     be non-personal, such as the individual's name, the date of
     hire, the current position title, the current rate of pay, the 
     organizational unit assignment (including office address and telephone 
     number), and the current job description.  These types of records are 
     public records and are available to governmental agencies upon request.

     Personal information is defined in Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8, 
     Section VII.B.4, Academic Personnel Manual Section 160-20-b(4), and 
     Staff Personnel Policy 605.19, as that information which is not 
     confidential (Section V above and Appendix C) or non-personal, and the 
     disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal 
     privacy of the individual.  Examples of the most common types of personal 
     information are included in the referenced section of Business and 
     Finance Bulletin RMP-8.  If a representative of a governmental agency 
     requests access to personal information about any employee, it will be 
     made available only if the governmental agency has a statutory right to 
     such access, or if the individual to whom the information pertains has 
     authorized release (Business and Finance Bulletin RMP-8, Section 
     VII.G.3., Academic Personnel Manual Section 160-20-d(3), Staff Personnel 
     Policy 605.22).  The governmental agency should agree to not release 
     personal information obtained from the University except to the subject 
     of the information or to authorized individuals.
 
#

Send comments or questions about this website to Connie Williams.
Last updated: March 16, 2007 .