Admissions Process "Dual admissions" proposal Admissions Data, 1995-2001 Text of SB-1 Student Fees Question and Answer Sheet About the Regents Text of SP-2 UC's work with K-12 Eligibility in the Local Context President's SAT proposal Task force report



Letter to the Regents regarding the Resolution Concerning
Future Admissions, Employment and Contracting Policies

by Regent Ward Connerly

For several weeks, Regent Judy Hopkinson and I have been speaking to each other in an effort to find an acceptable resolution of the controversies swirling around SP-1 and SP-2. Although each of us may have different perspectives about this matter, we all share a common desire to do what is best for the University and for the people of California.

For my part, I have always been guided by the perspective that I should first be true to my convictions, but, in doing so, always be respectful of the positions of others--and try to accommodate them in a manner that is consistent with my beliefs.

It is no secret that Regent Bill Bagley and I have serious differences on the issue at hand. Those differences are of a long-standing nature. It may come as a surprise to him to learn, however, that I share his desire to remove the University of California from the debate about race-based affirmative action. The people of California have resolved this issue and the book must be closed on this debate.

The resolution that we will be considering, RE-28, is one that will not please everyone. But, perhaps, that is the beauty of it. For many, it would be preferable to pound SP-1 into oblivion. For others, it would be desirable to impose a similar fate on the opponents of SP-1. Neither position is likely to prevail in a "knock down, drag out" battle on May 16. And, if either camp secured its position by a sharply divided vote, the University of California and our Board would bear the consequences of such an outcome.

The virtue of RE-28 is that it is reasonable and fair to all perspectives, consistent with the Constitution of California, responsive to the negative perceptions about the effects of SP-1, and leaves for another day those issues that are more appropriately matters to be addressed in a different venue.

It is my prayer that all of us can come together to approve a compromise resolution that might not please everyone, but eliminates an issue that needlessly consumes so much of our time. For this to be a success, we should all put our differences aside and work together in a spirit of collegiality. I pledge to do my part.

# # #