December 1, 1999

From: Kristine Hafner, Director, Business Initiatives

Re: UC Partnership for Performance Status Update

Existing Partnership for Performance Teams:

Human Resources : Goals and performance measures for the nine campuses and Office of the President have been refined, and data collected for core human resources functions for FY 97/98 and 7/1/98-12/31/98. Rogers Davis (UC San Diego) continues to coordinate the HR team. Several UC campuses are forming an extended HR benchmarking cohort group with other higher education institutions such as University of Michigan, Johns Hopkins and California State University. This group will build upon and expand the UC Partnership for Performance measurement work to date.

Environment Health and Safety : All campuses continue to participate in the Campus Safety Health and Environmental Management Association (CSHEMA) national benchmarking initiative which provides comparative data in a broad range of ES&H related program areas. Campuses now have the ability to trend 2-3 years of performance data, and to compare themselves to a large cohort group of higher education institutions nationwide. Most campuses have deployed a customer satisfaction survey designed by the EH&S directors, as well as a Baldrige style campus EH&S program self-assessment tool. Julie McNeal (UC Davis) is the EH&S team leader.

Facilities Management: The UC campuses, joined by USC, CalTech and Stanford, have done extensive work on financial performance indicators and are now focusing on internal process measures, as well as operational measures in grounds maintenance and custodial services. The grounds maintenance task force is evaluating cost per acre per campus to maintain developed land, undeveloped land and recreational intramural land. Jack Hug (UC San Diego) continues as team leader.

(APPA) (The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers) is actively involved in developing a strategic assessment model (SAM) which combines the balanced scorecard categories of performance measurement with a self-assessment framework inspired by the Baldrige criteria for excellence. For more information, see www.APPA.org/SAM.

Information Technology: Several IT Directors (UCI, UCSF, UCSD) are working as a sub-group to revise the UC goals for Information Technology and to develop new system-wide performance measures for information technology services. This work in progress will be shared with the University IT Directors in January, 2000 for input and finalization. Jim Dolgonas and Martha Winnacker (UCOP) are coordinating this effort from Office of the President.

 

Financial Operations:

Payroll: The payroll team (led by Mike O’Neill at UCOP) published a report (10/99) on their efforts to date, including performance measurement data for calendar years 1997 and 1998. To date, UCD, UCI and UCLA have deployed a departmental user customer satisfaction survey designed by the payroll managers.

Purchasing: The purchasing managers have developed goals and performance measures for central purchasing operations. They have reported FY ’99 baseline data. Dave Haskins (UCOP) coordinates this effort.

Travel Management:. The UC travel managers have developed a vision and goals for travel management, and have identified a set of performance measures. Data collection has been hampered by lack of access to data on some campuses.

New Partnership for Performance Teams :

Campus Balanced Scorecard Initiatives:

There is significant momentum at the campuses to incorporate organizational performance measurement into campus administrative operations. Increasingly, the performance measures developed by UC-wide Partnership for Performance teams are used as input to campus business unit measures. A number of the UC campuses are using the balanced scorecard to communicate direction and assess performance at the unit or department level.