University of California Logo for Teaching  

Learning and technology Center Teaching, Learning and technology  

Center
 
navigation to news navigation to strategies and assessment navigation to who's doing what navigation to toolbox navigation to communities

Funding

TLtC-Funded Projects
         
 

  Project Proposal:   
  
Teacher Education Using Instructional Technologies

  Participants:
  
UCI and UCSB

  Principal Investigators:
  Willis Copeland (UCSB)


   Overview of the Request

There is no issue more important to California's future than improving its public schools. The quality of these schools depends directly on the quality of the teachers working in them. That quality is being reduced to disastrous levels in schools across the state by the mushrooming shortage of qualified teachers in the state. To staff classrooms last year, schools needed to hire, on an emergency basis, over 40,000 "teachers" (14% of the work force) who did not have even the minimum qualifications of a credential. Most were without any experience teaching and, in many cases, there was not even minimum assurance that they possessed basic academic skills. And the problem is getting worse each year.

In his "New Partnership Agreement" UC President Atkinson has pledged to the state legislature that the University of California will do its part to counter this looming disaster in California's schools. Specifically, to meet teacher demand and improve the quality of teacher preparation, the President promised to increase "...the number of students enrolled in teacher credential programs from approximately 1,000 in 1998-99 to 2,500 by 2002-03, with a focus on increasing the number of first-time and new type credentials in math and science. This would more than double the number of teachers prepared by UC in 1998-99."

Our Difficult Instructional Problem
The eight teacher education programs in the UC system are thus faced with a most difficult instructional problem. The adequate preparation of new teachers is an intensive and time-consuming endeavor and we are being asked by UCOP to double our productivity almost immediately. It is clear that the implementation of new instructional technologies holds great potential for UC for meeting President Atkinson's commitment to the legislature and the people of California problem.

Two UC campuses, Irvine and Santa Barbara, are now in the third year of funding from the U.S. Department of Education's Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology Program (PT3.) As a main part of this work these projects have developed a number of applications of instructional technology intended to improve the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of teaching and learning in their two teacher credential programs. These two projects have thus far not collaborated in their development activities, nor have they consulted with the six other teacher education programs in the UC system about developments on those campuses. Though the applications that are being developed may work well locally, there is no guarantee that they could be exported for use by sister institutions.

We intend to overcome this wasteful difficulty. One purpose of this proposal is to seek planning funds to allow conversation between Irvine and Santa Barbara about what would be needed to enable sharing of the instructional technology products of the two projects. The second purpose is to explore the feasibility of 1) engaging all interested campuses in a process of cataloging those instructional technology applications that are currently in use throughout the system for teacher education, and 2) engaging in a series of "standardization" efforts intended to enable the distribution and use of these applications beyond their home campus. Thus, we are requesting funds for both planning and feasibility activities. The rationale for this request is presented below.

Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education
The Santa Barbara and Irvine projects are in the process of developing the following instructional technology products. We group them by pedagogical function.

Pedagogical Function - Analysis of Practice
Learning to make connections between principles of learning and actual classroom teaching practices is a crucial but difficult task for teaching credential students. The UCI Department of Education has developed classroom videocase examples and structured writing prompts that are delivered via webpages that students access outside of class time. Students are asked to bring to bear what they have learned in their courses to interpret and explain the teaching and learning they observe in video clip segments.
The practice of critically reflecting on one's teaching and on student learning is an important skill which novice teachers must master early in their careers. The UCI credential program also engages its students in the construction of videocases of their own teaching as objects for reflection. From a videotape of a particular instructional lesson, students critically select and edit clips that illustrate important ideas about teaching and learning. The clips are put into a web-based "electronic portfolio" into which students also write reflective annotations to explain the importance of each video clip. These annotations are electronically associated with the video clips in the portfolio.

In a similar manner, the UCSB Teacher Education Program has developed a series of online activities which present, on a course's website, exemplary videocases of technology use in classrooms. Students are asked to view the cases and then respond to a series of questions that elicit their analytical thoughts about the segments viewed. Students' responses are electronically submitted to a database that allows the course instructor to examine trends and identify topics that will be used in the following class to challenge students' thinking.

Pedagogical Function - Planning Skills
A key process in which all teachers must become skilled is the planning of learning experiences for pupils. UCSB has created a series of "Simulated Design Studios" (SDS's) into which its students "enter" as small working teams. Each SDS is specific to a grade level and content area and contains the necessary tools and resources to allow credential students to create a lesson or unit for a specified classroom of pupils. Each SDS is contained on a CD-ROM and features a user interface built on the metaphor of a workshop. "Tools," located on various "workbenches" in the SDS, are used to create such things as learning objectives, assessments, needed materials lists, and lesson delivery sequences. "Materials drawers" in the SDS contain background concerning the lesson's content, a list of California Content Standards, and a selection of available print materials, websites, computer applications, and samples of activities that have been designed by other teachers. Credential students have to decide which tools and resources to use, and in what order. Different students working in the same workshop are very likely to create discernibly different products which can be compared during a class meeting as is typical of all good design studio work.

Pedagogical Function - Building Communities of Practice
A central goal of any teacher education program is helping credential students to learn to work and collaborate with other professional educators. UCSB offers students the opportunity to "publish," on the Program's web site, successful lesson plans which have been peer reviewed and judged to meet appropriate selection criteria. These plans are collected in a database which allows easy search and retrieval. As the project grows, UCSB envisions adding to the website video examples of teachers delivering some of these exemplary lessons.

UCI has developed a methodology for students to engage in technology-mediated discussions in support of their fieldwork seminar course. As different weekly topics are covered, students write up their own observations and reflections and post them to an email listserv where members read one another's observations and reflections, and post responses. The seminar instructor also reads and gives students feedback about the aptness of the observations for a particular standard and the quality of the reflections that have been posted.

Pedagogical Function - Assessment of Knowledge Acquisition
UCSB has created examinations that assess students' acquisition of knowledge in their coursework. These examinations are delivered via web pages and offer both immediate feedback to the user as well as guided opportunities to correct their answers. This examination environment utilizes a combination of hypertext and Java programs to "branch" and thereby offer to students challenges that are most appropriate to their responses.

  Proposed Activities

The funding sought by this proposal will enable the following feasibility/planning activities:

Planning Conference
Two individuals from each of the eight UC Teacher Education Programs, nominated by each program's Director, will attend a one-day conference at Santa Barbara in late January. One of these people will be knowledgeable in the program's content and pedagogy; the other will bring information on current efforts to apply instructional technology in the program. The objectives of this meeting will be to: 1) identify and describe the various applications of instructional technology that are currently being used across the system, 2) identify technological and pedagogical barriers to the use of these applications by campuses where they were not developed, and 3) create a plan by which these barriers can be surmounted so that these applications can be transferred easily throughout the system. If all goes well, this plan will be the foundation of a Full-Scale Implementation Proposal to be submitted in April, 2002.

Coordination Meeting
In order to coordinate the above Planning Conference, the two Directors and a staff member from each of the UCI and UCSB PT3 projects will meet for one day immediately after notification of funding. The purpose of this meeting will be to work out the process of invitation, logistics for attendance and agenda of the above Planning Conference.

Post-Conference Analysis
The two Directors and their staffs will meet approximately two weeks after the above Planning Conference to synthesize the results of the conference, decide whether to pursue a Full-scale Implementation Grant, and, if that decision is positive, plan that proposal's development. Depending on the results of the Planning Conference, individuals from other UC Teacher Education Programs may be invited to this meeting.

 
   
Home  |  About  |  Help  |  UCOP
Questions? Comments? Contact Us
Copyright 2005  |  University of California Regents  |  All Rights Reserved
Policies + Usage Agreement
Last Updated: