Program 647,
  September 19, 2000

 

A. A Novel Cancer Treatment Takes a Big Step
B. Dietary Supplements Alone Can Not Prevent Disease
C. Why One Concussion in Young Athletes Increases Risk of Another
D. The Simple Truth about Scientific Studies
E. A More Efficient Way to Inspect Bridges


A. A Novel Cancer Treatment Takes a Big Step

Narrator: This is Science Today. For the first time, a virus that's been engineered to selectively kill cancer cells, is advancing to a clinical trial known as Phase 3, which determines whether or not the treatment can be used in clinical practice. Dr. Frank McCormick, who directs the University of California, San Francisco Cancer Center, developed the virus being used, which is called Onyx-015.

McCormick: It's definitely been clear for quite a long time that viruses do have some preference with replicating in cancer cells and that people have tried before, way back, to do this kind of thing. But this is the first specifically engineered virus that's gone this far.

Narrator: Onyx-015 is an adenovirus, one of the causes of the common cold. But it lacks a specific gene that neutralizes a tumor suppressive protein called p53, which is also sensitive to viral attack in normal cells. But cancer cells, for the most part, lack functional p53.

McCormick: By taking out the gene that neutralizes p53, we've made a virus that can only grow in cells that don't have any p53. The results we've attained so far are encouraging and promising, but we haven't formally begun to prove that this is having a clinical benefit.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Larissa Branin.


B. Dietary Supplements Alone Can Not Prevent Disease

Narrator: This is Science Today. A recent survey has found that more older Americans, the population most at risk of cancer, are taking dietary supplements as a cancer prevention, rather than eating more cancer-protective foods. Dr. Cheryl Rock of the University of California, San Diego, says many people seem to equate nutrition and prevention with vitamin and mineral supplements.

Rock: It's important to note that the bulk of the evidence that has linked some possible protective effect has not been through supplements, it's actually been through dietary choices. And it underscores how there is so much in food that we are only just beginning to identify and understand in terms of its cancer prevention potential. So, it's the whole package of what you eat, rather than prescribing a particular supplement.

Narrator: In the older population, there's a tendency to not want to spend a lot of time cooking. But Rock says that's not necessary.

Rock: If you have some frozen vegetables that can easily be popped in the microwave and ready to eat in seven minutes, it can make the difference between doing it and not.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Larissa Branin.


C. Why One Concussion in Young Athletes Increases Risk of Another

Narrator: This is Science Today. It's been found that college and high school football players, who have suffered from one concussion, are three times more likely to suffer from another, compared to players who have never experienced head trauma. Dr. Martin Holland, a professor of neurosurgery at the University of California, San Francisco says previous studies found more than half of high school football players returned to the game the same day as a loss of consciousness.

Holland: We have to educate trainers, educate coaches, educate parents and educate the players themselves in terms of somebody should realize, "look, I've just got my bell rung, I'm gonna stay out of the next couple of games."

Narrator:The new study was conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Holland says it confirms previous theories that one concussion increases the chances of getting a second one, which can lead to second impact syndrome.

Holland: The recovery after the second injury is longer. That's one of the reasons why we don't want to let athletes go back too soon, because this is well established, especially in the younger populations.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Larissa Branin.


D. The Simple Truth about Scientific Studies

Narrator: This is Science Today. It's not uncommon for the findings of a scientific study to be later contradicted by a follow-up. In fact Dr. Andrew Avins, an epidemiologist at the University of California, San Francisco, says that's just how science works.

Avins: Everybody who does this kind of work knows that we're always at risk for finding things that may not be true. That's just the reality of this kind of work and we know that our results have to be confirmed by other scientists and that frequently, because of these chance effects they're not confirmed.

Narrator: When it comes to matters that could affect our health, Avins says this can be very frustrating not just for the public, but also for doctors and clinicians.

Avins: Because we don't get nice pat, simple answers. But the fact is the human body is an enormously complex organism and it is very resistant to providing very neat, pat answers.

Narrator: In his own work, Avins has come up with contradictory findings to another study that had suggested trigylceride levels in men can predict heart disease.

Avins: So I understand the frustration of individuals and clinicians who are trying to make sense out of this, but the reality is, these aren't simple matters.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Larissa Branin.


E. A More Efficient Way to Inspect Bridges

Narrator: This is Science Today. This is Science Today. A revolutionary way to inspect bridge decks has been developed by researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Each year, highway inspectors shut down bridge lanes to conduct tedious visual and sound inspection of the decks. But Lab physicist Jose Hernandez says they've created the HERMES bridge inspector to do the job more efficiently.

Hernandez: It's this moving, high-speed machine that can give you a picture of what's inside of the deck without having to shut down the traffic or remove the asphalt. It's a trailer that was meant to be pulled by a truck or some other vehicle and on the rear of the trailer we have an array with sixty-four antennas.

Narrator: These are hooked up to 64 radar sensors pioneered at the Lab that can penetrate the concrete and give inspectors a view of the bridge deck that's similar to a cat scan.

Hernandez: It's really a first prototype, it's a research tool. The federal highway administration is currently testing it throughout the country, trying to assess the capabilities and limitations.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Larissa Branin.

 

Science Today is produced by the University of California
  Office of the President
and broadcast over the CBS Radio Network

For comments or more information about Science Today, contact Larissa Branin at larissa.branin@ucop.edu