Program 459,
  February 11, 1997

 

A. How Managed Care Leaves Some People In the Dust
B. Pain Relief: Many Variables
C. To Lose Weight, Treat the Whole Person
D. The Strongest Mutant Wins
E. Oxygen and Evolution


A. How Managed Care Leaves Some People In the Dust

Narrator: The managed care revolution is leaving some folks in the dust. This is Science Today. More and more Americans are getting health insurance through managed care. Health economist James Robinson of the University of California, Berkeley says that while it's helping contain costs, it's not doing anything to help the huge percentage of working Americans with no health insurance at all.

Robinson: Managed care by itself, or competition, they do not provide insurance for the uninsured. For most people, let's face it, that are uninsured, if they're going to get insured it's going to have to be through some sort of a subsidy which is ultimately going to have to come from the taxpayer. That's really in the end the only way it's going to happen.

Narrator: But in the short run, says Robinson, that's not going to happen -- taxpayers are in no mood to subsidize the uninsured.

Robinson: The only contribution that managed care could make to that is to the extent that managed care is successful in slowing or stopping the growth of costs, then at least the problem's not getting any worse. Because the root problem of lack of insurance is that health care costs so much. If health care didn't cost so much it would be easier to convince the taxpayer to cover everybody.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


B. Pain Relief: Many Variables

Narrator: This is Science Today. In a discovery noted around the world, Dr. Jon Levine of the University of California, San Francisco found that men and women responded differently to a type of pain reliever called a kappa-opioid: it helped women and didn't help men. It was the first time anyone had linked pain relief with gender. And Levine says in the future, doctors who prescribe painkillers might take other variables into account, too.

Levine: I think it's also important to know -- and we don't know yet -- whether they differ as a function of the age of patient. Whether in children versus older individuals the agents that we use should be different. We don't know at this point whether they differ by the race of an individual.

Narrator: Levine says those characteristics might be more important than we know.

Levine: In general we've thought, well, if somebody has cancer pain or arthritis pain, that determines how we should treat it. And we've not really taken into the equation whether or not somebody is female or male, whether or not they are young or old, and what their racial background may be.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


C. To Lose Weight, Treat the Whole Person

Narrator: To lose weight, treat the whole person. This is Science Today. Nutritionist Laurel Mellin of the University of California, San Francisco runs a weight-loss program called the Solution that, unlike most programs, apparently keeps working long after it's over. Mellin says her program teaches behaviors that, ideally, are learned in childhood -- nurturing and setting limits.

Mellin: If you don't know how to nurture yourself, of course you'll go for the third candy bar. If you don't know how to set limits and follow through effectively, why on earth would you be able to set an exercise goal, for example, and actually follow through with it?

Narrator: Mellin says that once those basic attitudes are changed, weight loss follows -- because now there's an internal motivation to lose weight and keep it off.

Mellin: What comes from that is once we know how to nurture ourselves, we begin to have more body pride. So there's the motivation to get up off the couch and push back from the table. It's almost natural to follow through with a reasonable way of eating and a healthful way of exercising in our lives.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


D. The Strongest Mutant Wins

Narrator: This is Science Today. In the last 10 years, there's been a dangerous rise in drug-resistant infections in major U.S. hospitals. Epidemiologist Lee Riley of the University of California, Berkeley says one bacteria, enterococcus, is now untreatable by even the strongest known antibiotic, vancomycin. And that's because vancomycin has been prescribed so heavily it's knocked out weaker mutations of enterococcus until only the strongest form remains.

Riley: The original reason for the use of vancomycin was because of the so-called staphylococcal infections. Staphylococcal infection is a very common infection in hospitals. The organism went through a series of antibiotics, and so vancomycin eventually became the last resort for treatment of staphylococcal infections.

Narrator: But in the meantime, enterococcus appeared in hospitals and went through a similar series of mutations...

Riley: ... and this organism has already become resistant to vancomycin. So the concern right now is -- in all the hospitals this is a major fear -- is seeing the appearance of staphylococcus that's become resistant to vancomycin. If that happens, a lot of people are going to be worried...

Narrator: ...because staph infection will be untreatable. For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar


E. Oxygen and Evolution

Narrator: This is Science Today. We take oxygen for granted, but the amount of it in the air wasn't always the same. Three hundred million years ago, for example, in what's called the Carboniferous era, the air was 35 percent oxygen, according to biologist Jeffrey Graham of the University of California, San Diego.

Graham: To put that in scale, the present atmospheric oxygen level's about 21 percent oxygen. And so a 35 percent level of oxygen is roughly one and a half times as much oxygen as there is now.

Narrator: Graham says that much oxygen had an effect on evolution. The air was so thick and rich that flying insects could be a lot bigger than they are today. Dragonflies, for instance...

Graham: And these dragonflies were immense compared to modern day dragonflies. For example, the biggest dragonfly that we find in nature today might have a wingspan of about six inches. Whereas the late Paleozoic or Carboniferous dragonflies had wingspans of close to over two feet. So they were huge animals, the size of -- probably of seagulls.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.

Science Today is produced by the University of California
  Office of the President
and broadcast over the CBS Radio Network

For comments or more information about Science Today, contact Larissa Branin at larissa.branin@ucop.edu