Program 454,
  January 7, 1997

 

A. An Alternative to Gasoline
B. DNA Testing: Fraught With Peril
C. No Chemicals On the Horizon
D. A Model Theory
E. And You Thought It Was Just Grass


A. An Alternative to Gasoline

Narrator: This is Science Today. You may not think about it tomorrow, but eventually gasoline is going to run out. The search for alternative fuels is on, and engineer Jim Heffel of the University of California, Riverside has a likely candidate: hydrogen. He and his team have modified a conventional truck to run on tanks of the lighter-than-air element.

Heffel: Our truck has the same engine that came with the vehicle. We did a few modifications to the engine, mainly to improve performance. Hydrogen has a little less energy content than gasoline, so to keep the same performance we've added a turbocharger.

Narrator: But that same lower energy content has safety advantages, too.

Heffel: Studies have been done where they've punctured a tank and lit it on fire and because the flame emits a lot less heat than, say, natural gas or gasoline, you can get real close to it. What's nice about that is that the chances of catching other things on fire are reduced.

Narrator: Besides that, hydrogen is non-toxic, non-polluting, and won't run out -- because it's made from water. For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


B. DNA Testing: Fraught With Peril

Narrator: This is Science Today. More suspects are being convicted -- or freed -- based on DNA testing. Criminologist William Thompson of the University of California, Irvine says the problem is that juries often don't understand exactly what the test means.

Thomson: When the evidence is used to incriminate somebody, basically the laboratory is saying that they find a match or a similarity between the genetic characteristics of two samples. And because the genetic characteristics of samples is not something that people in their everyday experience know a lot about, you have to say something to the jury to explain to them the meaning of a match.

Narrator: Thompson says statistics like "one in a billion match" are meaningless by themselves. DNA samples are compared at only a few spots along the sample -- and there's plenty of room for error.

Thompson: And the value of a match across several sites for incriminating somebody varies dramatically depending on how rare the matching characteristics are and how certain we are that what's being called a match is really a match.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


C. No Chemicals On the Horizon

Narrator: This is Science Today. A pest called the codling moth causes millions of dollars in damage every year to apples, walnuts and other crops. Entomologist Lou Falcon of the University of California, Berkeley says that traditionally, conventional pesticides have kept it under control.

Falcon: However in recent years resistance has been showing up, and it appears that it takes more chemical now than it did a few years ago. And even with more chemical the control appears to be failing, so that it may not be around too much longer.

Narrator: Fortunately, the government has approved an organic pesticide developed by Falcon -- a virus that attacks only the codling moth -- and just in time too. There are no new chemical pesticides on the horizon.

Falcon: The development of new pesticides is very very very slow, extremely expensive, and the chemical industry is really not producing or developing very many new pesticides. So not only is it a matter of supplanting, but it's a matter of finding alternatives.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


D. A Model Theory

Narrator: This is Science Today. To look at the details of a molecule or the interior of the earth, scientists usually use 3-D graphics on a computer screen. Mike Bailey, a supercomputer expert at the University of California, San Diego, has a new device that makes physical models you can hold in your hand. He says the models help scientists see things in an entirely new way.

Bailey: The scientists have seen features in the solid models that they completely missed through months or years of study on computer graphics screens.

Narrator: The question is why. Bailey has a few theories. One is that you can run your fingers along a model.

Bailey: And as you run your fingers through the valleys and the peaks on different models, you get some better sense of what the geometry is.

Narrator: Another theory is that the focus of your eyes changes.

Bailey: When you look at a graphics screen, no matter what, it's a flat screen and everything focuses at the same distance. Whereas if you look at this, your eyes are constantly shifting back and forth in focus, and we believe that gives you some kind of clues as to the depth.

Narrator: Bailey is designing experiments to test his theories. For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.


E. And You Thought It Was Just Grass

Narrator: And you thought it was just a baseball field. This is Science Today. Steve Cockerham, an agricultural expert at the University of California, Riverside, was asked to supply a new kind of natural grass that would grow indoors in a domed professional baseball stadium. That was the easy part. A pro baseball field has to be totally even so the ball won't take a bad bounce...

Cockerham: It has to be able to heal quickly from injury, if there's injury from a player skidding or tearing it up or whatever. And then the color has to be satisfactory, a good dark green color. The esthetics of this are almost as important as the performance.

Narrator: Plus, it has to grow quickly. But you have to be able to mow it down to half an inch. And...

Cockerham: The texture of the grass has to be such that it looks like a carpet, it can't be too coarse or too fine. It has to be such that it will give when a cleat hangs up in it so that it doesn't cause an injury. So these are some of the characteristics we look for.

Narrator: For Science Today, I'm Steve Tokar.

 

 

 

Science Today is produced by the University of California
  Office of the President
and broadcast over the CBS Radio Network

For comments or more information about Science Today, contact Larissa Branin at larissa.branin@ucop.edu