|
A Brief History of the Atkinson Presidency (1995 - 2003)
By Patricia A. Pelfrey
Richard C. Atkinson led the University of California into the post-affirmative
action era and American education into a new chapter in the history
of standardized testing as seventeenth president of the nation’s
leading multicampus
system. His eight-year tenure was marked by innovative approaches
to admissions and outreach, research initiatives to accelerate the
University’s contributions to the state’s economy, and
a challenge to the country’s most widely used admissions examination–the
SAT I–that paved the way to major change in how millions of
young Americans will be tested for college admission.
As the University heads into a new and difficult budgetary climate,
the Atkinson years will be remembered as a time of great growth
and prosperity, a period in which UC’s State-funded budget
rose to new highs and federal
research funding and private giving regularly set new records. The
University named the founding chancellor for UC Merced, its first
new campus in 30 years and the first American research university
of the twenty-first century. It established several new professional
schools and initiated growth in its graduate programs with a plan
for the addition of 11,000 graduate students over the next decade.
Eight of the University’s ten current chancellors were appointed
during Atkinson’s presidency.
UC expanded its national presence with a new center in Washington,
D.C. and its international reach with centers in London and Mexico
City. The California Digital Library, a pioneering effort to make
the University’s vast collections more accessible to scholars
and the public and to encourage new forms of scholarly communication,
reflected the University’s leadership in the evolving world
of digital telecommunications.
Atkinson’s highest priority was maintaining the distinction
of UC’s 7,000-member faculty. The academic excellence of the
University and its faculty was recognized in several national studies
of academic program quality, one of
which noted “the extraordinary research performance of the
entire University of California system” among American universities,
public and private. UC’s membership in the prestigious Association
of American Universities–six of its nine general campuses–exceeds
that of any other multicampus system. Eleven UC faculty members
were awarded Nobel Prizes during Atkinson’s tenure, more than
under any other UC president.
As chancellor of UC San Diego from 1980 to 1995–during which
the young campus rose to rank tenth among American research universities–Atkinson
combined driving energy and a gift for persuasion with an unswerving
pursuit of his goals. As president of the UC System, he attacked
the University’s greatest opportunities and most intractable
problems with the same persistent vigor.
Atkinson faced his share of crises and controversies, among them
an early and public disagreement with some members of the Board
of Regents over the implementation date of SP-1, the ban on racial
preferences in UC admissions. UCSF Stanford Healthcare, the merger
of the clinical enterprises of UC San Francisco and Stanford University,
was an historic but ultimately unsuccessful attempt to address the
competitive pressures of the health-care marketplace. Dealing with
the fallout of California’s sudden transition from prosperity
to recession has confronted the University with painful choices.
And UC’s administration of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
laboratory at Los Alamos has come under fire in recent years, resulting
in a decision by DOE to put the laboratory’s management contract
up for competition when it expires in 2005.
But the issues that dominated the Atkinson administration were
the issues shaping California: the state’s emergence as the
world’s leading knowledge-based economy and the rapidly growing
size and diversity of its population, which brought the first of
the largest student generation since the 1960s to the University’s
door.
Atkinson’s administrative and intellectual leadership of the
University reflected a deliberate effort to define UC’s role
in this changing California.
SP-1 and UC outreach
His earliest and greatest challenge was in the contentious arena
of UC admissions. He was named president in August 1995, just weeks
after the Board of Regents voted to approve SP-1, which abolished
the use of race and ethnicity as factors in admission and put UC
in the national spotlight as the first major American university
to end affirmative action in the admission of students. The ban
on racial preferences was extended to all public entities in California
sixteen months later with the passage of Proposition 209.
For UC’s president and chancellors, SP-1 and Proposition
209 were an exacting test of leadership in reversing three decades
of race-attentive policies while also ensuring that UC, as a public
university in the nation’s most diverse state, continued to
be seen as a welcoming place for minority students.
Under Atkinson’s leadership, the University dramatically
expanded its partnerships with the K-12 schools to raise academic
achievement throughout California, especially in those districts
with high proportions of academically
disadvantaged students. In 2001, the school/university partnerships
served more than 97,000 students in 256 schools annually, representing
a level of institutional involvement unprecedented in American higher
education. At Governor Gray Davis's request and as part of his school
reform initiative, the University established the Principal Leadership
Institute, the California Professional Development Institutes, and
a series of other initiatives to improve the preparation of California's
teachers and K-12 administrators.
Eight years after the passage of SP-1, UC is admitting more underrepresented
students–Latinos, African Americans, and Native Americans–than
it was in 1997, the year before SP-1 took effect. In fall 1997,
underrepresented minorities made up 18.8 percent of UC’s systemwide
freshman class; in fall 2003, the figure is 19.8 percent.
With Atkinson’s support, The Regents voted to rescind SP-1
in May 2001. The Board’s resolution affirmed the University’s
intent to continue complying with Proposition 209's ban on racial
preferences and reaffirmed UC’s commitment to enrolling a
student body that reflects both exceptional achievement and “the
broad diversity of backgrounds characteristic of California.”
Research for a dynamic economy
Atkinson came to the UC presidency convinced that twenty-first
century science requires new forms of organization and funding.
In particular, his goal was to tap the enormous potential within
the University for research that serves the needs of California’s
economy. One of his first acts as president was to establish the
Industry-University Cooperative Research Program (IUCRP) to promote
research partnerships with industry in disciplines critical to the
state’s economic competitiveness. The IUCRP is now a $250
million enterprise that supports more than 500 projects, jointly
supported by State, UC, and industry funds, in areas ranging from
biotechnology to digital media. The program is unusual in its emphasis
on early-stage investigations that promise to yield new products
and technologies and boost the state’s economic productivity.
To address a looming crisis in the state’s supply of engineers
and computer scientists, in 1997 Atkinson committed the University
to increasing enrollments in those fields 50 percent by 2005-6.
UC exceeded this goal in 2002, four years ahead of schedule, and
expects engineering and computer science enrollments to reach 27,000
in 2003-2004–up from 16,000 in 1997-98. The initiative represents
the first real growth in the state’s engineering programs
since the 1968 Terman Report brought expansion of engineering education
in California to a virtual halt.
Governor Davis, also a believer in the dynamic role of innovative
research in ensuring California’s economic leadership, has
been an enthusiastic supporter of the University’s efforts.
In 2000, he asked UC to establish four California Institutes for
Science and Innovation (CISIs) on its campuses. The institutes bring
together industry and university researchers to concentrate on scientific
challenges that are ripe for application in the fields of nanotechnology,
telecommunications and information technology, biotechnology and
quantitative medicine, and
information technology. The CISIs constitute one of the most far-reaching
efforts in the nation to create new basic research and education
programs and then to link them with the state’s entrepreneurial
industries through intensive partnerships. They are unique among
industry-university initiatives in their aim to create the economy
of the future.
Tidal Wave II and UC admissions policy
Another challenge of the Atkinson era was preparing the University
for a new generation of students–Tidal Wave II, the children
of the Baby Boomers. Accommodating its share of Tidal Wave II meant
finding a place on UC
campuses for 63,000 additional students–an enrollment increase
of 40 percent--and recruiting 7,000 new faculty between 1998 and
2010. Atkinson initiated a comprehensive planning effort to help
the University grow quickly
without endangering its quality.
The Atkinson presidency was notable for its intense focus on the
issue of educational opportunity, a matter of increasing public
and legislative scrutiny because of SP-1 and growing competition
for admission to UC. Atkinson
played an active role in reshaping UC’s admissions policies
and practices to make them, in his words,“demonstrably inclusive
and fair.” On his recommendation, the University’s Academic
Senate and The Regents approved two new paths to admission–Eligibility
in the Local Context and the Dual Admissions program. Both programs
cast a wider net for talent by supplementing traditional grades
and test scores with broader measures of student achievement, among
them what students have made of their opportunities to learn. In
addition,undergraduate applicants now receive the kind of comprehensive
review of their qualifications usually associated with selective
private universities.
Achievement versus aptitude
Atkinson has earned a place in the annals of standardized testing
for his challenge to higher education’s decades-long reliance
on aptitude tests to predict students’ readiness for college.
He made national headlines in February 2001 when he told the American
Council on Education that he had asked the Academic Senate of the
University of California to drop the SAT I examination requirement
in favor of tests that assess what students actually learn in school
rather than “ill-defined notions of aptitude.” The announcement
that the country’s largest user of the SAT was considering
eliminating it sent shock waves through American higher education,
and Atkinson’s case for achievement tests–that they
are more reliable predictors of future success, fairer to students,
and better guides for schools– unleashed a lively national
debate on standardized testing.
In June 2002 the College Board, sponsor of the SAT, announced
that beginning in 2005 it would add a written essay and more rigorous
mathematics section to the 76-year-old test. Atkinson welcomed the
decision and praised the College Board for having “laid the
foundation for a new test that will better serve our students and
schools.”
The Atkinson years
The University’s seventeenth president will be remembered
for his absolute commitment to faculty quality, his skill in balancing
UC’s competing pressures and responsibilities, and his resourcefulness
in using the opportunities prosperity offered to urge the University
in new directions. “The role of knowledge in transforming
virtually every aspect of our world has moved research universities
to center stage of American life,” he once said, a conviction
that has animated the leadership he brought to the University as
chancellor and as president. His place in the history of the University
of California and of American higher education is secure.
Patricia A. Pelfrey is a visiting research associate at the
Center for Studies in Higher Education at the University of California’s
Berkeley campus.
|