UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
ACADEMIC PLANNING COUNCIL

Bulletin #19


December 7, 1995


1. Prospectus for University Extension Part-Time Degrees

On behalf of UC's Council of University Extension Deans, Berkeley's Dean of University Extension Mary Metz introduced a draft prospectus describing the rationale and potential for using University Extension (UNEX) in new ways to deliver degree programs to students not now served by UC. The Deans are preparing it for discussion in response to an invitation from the APC's Advisory Committee on Policy for High Fee Part-time Professional Programs. The prospectus is intended to promote Academic Senate and administrative comment on the concept. Actual proposals for new degree programs would emerge only if a new policy permitting them is put in place after consultation about this prospectus.

The Deans believe that UNEX could expand access for working adults to UC-quality degrees in two ways:

a. Academic departments could work cooperatively with UNEX to deliver currently authorized programs in formats geared to the needs of part-time students; current policy permits this kind of collaboration, though there are often procedural barriers on the campuses.

b. UNEX could be authorized to offer non-duplicative special degree programs, geared to groups not served by regular programs; however, UC policy prohibiting UNEX from offering degrees would have to be changed for this to happen.

In discussion, Dean Metz described the degree programs currently provided by continuing education divisions at such universities as Harvard, Stanford, and Washington. She pointed out that UC was unusual among its peers in not offering similar opportunities. Dean Metz stressed that if UNEX were authorized to offer degrees, those programs must operate with Senate review, approval, and oversight.

APC members advised that the rationale for these new roles must convincingly answer the following questions:

What is the demand for such programs?

Who offers such programs now and why should UC enter these markets?

Given the demands of traditional programs, what incentives are there for faculty to participate in offering UNEX degrees?

What potential impacts might such degree programs have on the regular undergraduate and graduate programs of the University and on its missions?

How would such programs affect public perceptions of the University's priorities?

APC members asked that a revised prospectus highlight the difference between self-supporting programs, as proposed by the Deans, and high fee programs. An APC subcommittee will advise on revision of the prospectus, to be followed by full Universitywide review, initiated through the Council of Vice Chancellors and the Academic Council.

2. UC's Influence on California's Economy and Society

APC student member Welner presented the UC Student Association resolution calling on UC to increase incentives for faculty and others in UC to help the K-12 schools improve the education of traditionally underrepresented students. Though the UCSA adopted the resolution almost a year ago, it remains pertinent as UC seeks new ways to reach out to students of all ethnic backgrounds. APC members warned that expectations of how much UC can really do should not be exaggerated; nevertheless, the call for increased service, especially to improve preparation in K-12, echoes both the recommendations from the University's 1993 planning retreat and many national reports. The Office of the President will shortly be issuing a compendium of UC efforts to assist and sustain K-12. This and related reports will inform continued discussion at the January APC meeting.

3. On-going Activities

a. Reports on Systemwide Planning Issues in Progress among Administrative Groups and Senate Committees

APC members who represent Universitywide groups and committees are now being asked to report monthly on the chief planning issues before their groups. This allows the APC to improve information exchange among groups and identify planning priorities not yet being addressed in the system. Among this month's reports were many items already being actively pursued, and two developing issues that APC members felt deserved attention by the appropriate bodies:

the new Pew Trust report calling for reductions in health sciences programs in light of changes in the health care environment, and

the large unfunded increase in demand on our campuses for disabled student services.

b. Further Work on the APC Statement of Purpose and Priorities for 1995-96

APC members also continued to debate and refine the concept of systemwide academic planning, expressed through the APC Statement of Purpose.

c. Announcement

Provost King announced that Richard A Clarke, former chair of Pacific Gas and Electric, will join him in co-chairing the Regents new UC Outreach Task Force. The Task Force is to advise on ways to increase the pool of minority and low-income students eligible for admission to UC.

The next meeting of the APC will be held in Oakland on January 31, 1996.