| |
November 2005 UC Notes Home |
| |
|
This month some 100,000 students are expected to apply to the University of California. Of those, approximately 80 percent will be offered admission, and nearly half of those will enroll at one of UCís nine undergraduate campuses. Will they stay in school and graduate in four, five or six years? Their chances are improving. UC graduation rates for entering freshmen and transfer students have climbed steadily in the last five years. If that trend holds, more than 80 percent of the freshman class that enters UC in 2006 will graduate within six years. More than 82 percent of transfer students who enroll at that time will graduate by 2010. While above the national average, retention and graduation rates at most UC campuses still lag behind those of the private and public institutions they are most often measured against, such as Harvard, Stanford and the University of Virginia. For example, Virginia had a 92 percent six-year graduation rate for the class of 2003, compared to UCLA's 86.7 percent, the highest among UC campuses. These differences are driven largely by the differences in the socioeconomic backgrounds of each college's students. At UCLA, for example, more than 35 percent of undergraduates receive Pell Grants — the highest proportion in the nation. Only 8.6 percent of Virginia's students received the federal grant in 2003. The financial pressure these students face can affect their likelihood of completing a degree. "We need more money, especially scholarship money," says Karen Kenney, who retired last month from her post as UC Berkeley's dean of students after more than 25 years. For underrepresented students, the pressure is sometimes more acute. "African American, Latino and Native American students often end up representing their communities," Kenney says. "They're on committees; they work in the recruitment and retention centers. Those are unpaid hours that take them away from their studies and paid jobs. We need money to help support them." Financial aid is certainly not the only factor in retaining students. Kenney and other educators are in widespread agreement that students also need a sense of belonging and commitment to stay in school, regardless of financial circumstances. In the coming months, UC Notes will take a look at campus programs that enhance students' academic engagement, social integration and transition to college. This month, we examine programs that nurture students academically in ways more often associated with small colleges than major research universities. Terms of EngagementMany incoming freshmen, particularly first-generation college students, don't fully appreciate the changes they have to make to be as successful as they were in high school. They're surprised by the rapid pace of the quarter system, the amount of material covered and the level of independence with which they are expected to perform. "We are concerned about the number of freshmen who end up on academic probation," says Andrew Grosovsky, associate vice provost for undergraduate education at UC Riverside. "That is a challenging path." UC Riverside provides a safety mechanism for many freshmen, support that goes beyond professors' office hours and traditional tutoring. Explains Grosovsky, "We identified introductory courses that we know students struggle in, courses that have a high number of unsatisfactory outcomes, and we began to work with the instructors of those courses, asking what kind of programs would offer extra academic support so students don't fall off the cliff." Four departments — Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics and Philosophy — now offer specialized tutoring in introductory courses. Department faculty determine the criteria for tutors, who are either graduate student TAs or upper-division undergraduates, but the goal is the same across departments: to begin identifying and offering help to struggling students by the third week of the quarter. While campus learning centers provide a valuable service, tutors in centralized programs often aren't familiar with the pacing of a class or how an instructor frames the material. In the new Riverside program, tutors work directly with instructors and attend discussion sections; this intimate knowledge of the class allows them to be more responsive. They also become known to students, who, Grosovsky hopes, will come to see the tutors as peers. There is potential for expanding the program, and at least one other department is expected to add the tutoring component to its introductory courses. "What we learn now will shape the program in the future," Grosovsky says. Live and Learn Seventeen UCLA faculty members and their families live in one- and two-bedroom apartments across campus. They share meals with students in the dining commons and participate in planned programs. On a recent night, for instance, about 30 students gathered with several faculty members for a screening of Crash and an informal discussion about race. Others get together for book groups or panel discussions on political issues. Some on-campus faculty offer academic assistance, including workshops on writing research papers and preparing for essay exams, but not all activity is scholastic. Spontaneous student-faculty hikes are common, and several professors host impromptu open houses or invite students to share in their outside passions, from cooking to photography. Others run "cookie patrol," dispensing treats to students during finals week. Suzanne Seplow, director of the Office of Residential Life, which oversees FIR, is a firm believer in the program; she has lived in DeNeve Commons for two and a half years. In addition to her director's duties, Seplow teaches a Fiat Lux seminar and Honors Colloquium courses. "Being part of the residential community is critical, whether I'm in the classroom or wearing my director's hat," she says. "It enables me to connect to issues students deal with on a day-to-day basis." The reach of the program goes beyond the residence halls. "The comment we hear most frequently from faculty is, 'This program has made me a better teacher,'" Seplow says. That benefits the entire campus community. Coaches recruit student-athletes who show academic potential, a desire to learn and a willingness to use support services available through the Athletic Study Center (ASC). These include advising, tutoring, career planning and professional training services, as well as a spacious arboretum for quiet study and a computer lab. ASC director Derek Van Rheenen, a former Cal and professional soccer player, has also developed a database to track the academic progress, performance and career interests of Berkeley's student-athletes. New this year is Faculty Athletic Fellows, in which faculty act as career mentors and advisers to each of Berkeley's 27 teams. The program is designed to "build intellectual, academic and career-oriented mentorships," says Van Rheenen, who also teaches in the Graduate School of Education. "We're trying to honor the institutional commitment to these young men and women and help them realize their academic, as well as their athletic, potential." Faculty members may cheer at games and meet with athletes interested in majoring in their fields. Some have experience the student-athletes can relate to. Mark Brilliant, an assistant professor of history and American studies, signed on to mentor the men's swim team. Brilliant, once an intercollegiate swimmer himself, invites team members to e-mail him and visit him during office hours. "Just having someone on the faculty to whom they can talk about juggling life as a Division I athlete at a world-class academic institution is invaluable," he says. For Jill Malko, head coach of the womenís lacrosse team, the best part of the program is that it breaks down the stereotype of Berkeley as an impersonal institution. "Even if a kid never interacts [with the Faculty Athletic Fellows], they get
a sense that faculty here are people." |
||
| UC Notes Home © 2005 Regents of the University of California Last Updated November 15, 2005
|