[The following was edited on 10/20/2006.  Changes from the original 10/13/2006 message are in italics.]

From:  David Walker <David.Walker@UCOP.EDU>
Reply-To:  David Walker <David.Walker@UCOP.EDU>
To:  UCIDMGMT-L@LISTSERV.UCOP.EDU
Subject:  Agenda for our 10/24/2006 meeting at UCR
Date:  Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:06:52 -0700

Everyone,

Here is an agenda for our next meeting at UCR (Tuesday, 10/24/2006, 10:00-3:00).  Please send any comments to the list.


David


From:  David Walker <David.Walker@UCOP.EDU>
Reply-To:  David Walker <David.Walker@UCOP.EDU>
To:  UCIDMGMT-L@LISTSERV.UCOP.EDU
Subject:  Ensuring the Validity and Correctness of UCTrust Security Information
Date:  Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:05:10 -0700



Everyone,

As promised, I've posted a proposal for managing UCTrust metadata and other security-related information at:

http://www.ucop.edu/irc/advtech/UCTrustWG/UCTrustSigning/UCTrustSigning-2006-10-06.html

We'll discuss it at our meeting on 10/24, but please send any comments you may have before then to the list.  For those of you who are so inclined, I've also collected the Perl scripts and GPG keyrings that are mentioned in that document, as well as a test case at:

http://www.ucop.edu/irc/advtech/UCTrustWG/UCTrustSigning/UCTrustSigning.tar.gz

They were developed under SuSE Linux 10.1, but I think they should be reasonably portable.  If you're familiar with Perl and GPG, please look this over to find the errors, operational difficulties, etc.  In particular, the GPG commands that verify digital signatures generate warnings about untrusted keys that I'd like to know how to eliminate.

David


Word document attachment (ERS_and_UC_Trust.doc)