Office of General Counsel
The Ninth Circuit recently held that academic employees’ speech, pursuant to their official duties, may be protected by the first amendment.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Medtronic v. Mirowski, held that when a licensee sues a patent owner in a “declaratory judgment” action, the patent owner has the burden of proving infringement by the licensee.
Two recent rulings address significant issues related to the California Public Records Act (PRA). One court upheld the University’s ability to protect researcher communications and scholarly research data. Another court concluded that the City of San Jose was required to disclose city-related communications even though they were sent on employees’ private devices.
Two recent U.S. Supreme Court cases defined “supervisor” for purposes of discriminatory harassment claims and adopted the “but for” causation standard for retaliation claims. The rulings will have limited effect in California because they apply to federal claims under Title VII but not claims brought under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
U.S. Supreme Court leaves intact its prior holdings regarding race- conscious admissions programs and defers ruling specifically on UT’s program.
U.S. Supreme Court holds that unmodified genes cannot be patented, but modified genes can be.
U.S. Supreme Court affirms the right of a patent owner to control self-replicating plant seed inventions.
A recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision holding Michigan’s anti-affirmative action law unconstitutional may lead the U.S. Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 209.
A recent federal case creates significant uncertainty for University researchers who wish to protect their unpublished research materials.
Recent legal developments recommend a comprehensive and thoughtful approach to eReserves.
The California Supreme Court's highly publicized Brinker decision clarifies meal and rest break requirements for private sector employers but has little effect on the University.
U.S. Supreme Court holds that medical diagnostic methods must have an inventive feature to qualify as patent-eligible subject matter.
New California laws limit the use of credit related information for employment purposes and affect the type of notice employers are required to give applicants and employees prior to obtaining a consumer credit report about them.
The California Supreme Court upholds legislation abolishing redevelopment agencies and strikes down the legislative attempt to save them.
Congress passes patent reform legislation to promote innovation.
The U.S. Supreme Court held that a nondiscrimination policy requiring registered student organizations to allow any interested students to participate is constitutional. The Ninth Circuit has now held that a more specific prohibition (e.g., a prohibition of discrimination specifically based on religion but not political beliefs) may also be constitutional.
Supreme Court ruling in closely-watched sex discrimination case is likely to deter large class actions.
U.S. Supreme Court affirms that a company's contract with a university inventor regarding future inventions trumps the rights of the university employer in federally-funded inventions.
On March 2, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Snyder v. Phelps in which it reaffirmed that speech on issues of public concern is constitutionally protected.
Plaintiffs in Martinez v. Regents of the University of California are petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to review the California Supreme Court's affirmation that nonresidents may pay in-state tuition at public colleges and universities.
The California Supreme Court affirmed that public employers have the right to decide to lay off employees for budgetary reasons without bargaining that decision with their unions. The effects of a layoff remain subject to bargaining.
White House directs changes to regulations and policies to promote educational exchange between accredited colleges and universities and Cuba.
Fees assessed by the Regents of the University of California are unaffected by the supermajority vote requirement imposed under Proposition 26 approved by voters in November 2010.
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a Hastings College of the Law policy that prohibits registered student organizations from excluding students from membership or leadership positions on the basis of their status or beliefs.
A recent court ruling reaffirms that contractual indemnification is an essential tool to minimize financial risk in business transactions.
The FPPC requires designated officials to report all reimbursements for speeches, panels and seminars from non-governmental third parties regardless of location.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) applies any time the University approves a project that could have an adverse effect on the environment.
California's E-Discovery Act requires the University to preserve relevant electronically stored information (ESI) in state court litigation.
Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 increases safeguards and transparency for young consumers.
U.S. Supreme Court requires "Strong Basis in Evidence" standard for showing disparate impact in employee selection tests.
Executive order suspends funding for specific state contracts entered into, on or after March 1, 2009.