RD1.8 PROS AND CONS OF INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITY COMBINATIONS
(see [II]:2.2.1)
| COMBINATION 1 | ||
|---|---|---|
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Design professional
Contract Administration:
Inspection:
|
No divided responsibility of inspection.
No third-party relationship if design professional uses inspection agency. |
Design professional is inspecting own
design work.
Inspector may be unfamiliar with University procedures or project. Design professional is usually not staffed to perform inspection and may need to hire outside personnel. |
| COMBINATION 2 | ||
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Design professional
Contract Administration:
Inspection:
|
Most common situation.
Inspectors are familiar with buildings, grounds, and personnel. Inspectors know Facility administrative requirements. Regents prefer this method (Regents' Action Item of November 19, 1971). |
Peaks and valleys of construction volume
present staffing problems.
Dual responsibility set up by another party directing Facility employees. UC must provide inspector training and education. Inspection oversights are assumed by UC. Inspectors are more subject to influence of Facility management and client/user. |
| COMBINATION 3 | ||
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Design professional
Contract Administration:
Inspection:
|
Dual responsibility of another party
directing Facility employees is averted.
Inspectors are familiar with buildings, grounds, and personnel. Inspectors know Facility administrative requirements. |
Sets up conflict in contract administration
between Facility project manager and
design professional.
Peaks and valleys of construction volume present staffing problems. UC must provide inspector training and education. Inspection oversights are assumed by UC. Inspectors are more subject to influence of Facility management and client/user. |
| COMBINATION 4 | ||
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Design professional
Contract Administration:
Inspection:
|
No division of responsibility for contract
administration and inspection.
Inspectors are familiar with buildings, grounds, and personnel. Inspectors know Facility administrative requirements. |
No benefit of design professional's input.
Peaks and valleys of construction volume present staffing problems. UC must provide inspector training and education. Inspection oversights are assumed by UC. Inspectors are more subject to influence of Facility management and client/user. |
| COMBINATION 5 | ||
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Facility
Contract Administration:
Inspection:
|
No dual responsibility between design,
contract administration, and inspection.
Inspectors are familiar with buildings, grounds, and personnel. Inspectors know Facility administrative requirements. |
Peaks and valleys of construction volume
present staffing problems.
UC must provide inspector training and education. Inspection oversights are assumed by UC. Inspectors are more subject to influence of Facility management and client/user. |
| COMBINATION 6 | ||
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Facility
Contract Administration:
Inspection:
|
No staffing problems during construction
peaks and valleys.
Facility does not provide inspector training and education. |
No benefit of design professional's input.
Inspection oversights must be passed on to third party. Inspectors are under direction of Facility but are paid by third party, thereby creating a division of "loyalty." Possible dual responsibility exists between contract administration and inspection. Quality of inspectors may vary. Inspectors may not be familiar with buildings, grounds, and personnel. |
| COMBINATION 7 | ||
| RESPONSIBILITIES | PROS | CONS |
|
Design: Project manager outside firm
Contract Administration:
Inspection: |
Complete responsibility with one firm. |
Special exception to University policy.
No benefit of design professional's input. Inspection oversights must be passed on to third party. Quality of inspectors may vary. Inspectors may not be familiar with buildings, grounds, and personnel. |